"Old" credits vs BOINC's default new credit system |
Message boards : Number crunching : "Old" credits vs BOINC's default new credit system
Author | Message |
---|---|
TJM Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 25 Aug 07 Posts: 843 Credit: 267,994,998 RAC: 0 |
Which one do you like better and why ? A quick summary: My old system used values manually assigned to workunits, which were constant for each workunit type. For example, it was 5.64 for hxzkv38 series. The new credit system calculates it's own credits, for most of the results granted values are a bit higher than my defaults (average for hxzkv38 is around 8.5), however for some hosts it's higher than average and for others might be lower, IMO it lacks a bit of fairness, because the work done is always the same. M4 Project homepage M4 Project wiki |
thinking_goose Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 119 Credit: 2,750,621 RAC: 0 |
I was OK with the old system: do the same work, get the same credit. But I haven't noticed much of a difference either way. |
mfbabb2 Send message Joined: 29 Sep 09 Posts: 5 Credit: 10,581 RAC: 0 |
I like the new system. While the credit bounces around, it is generally about twice the 5.64 old value (on my old AMD machine). My newer Vista C2D is getting 7.83 (consistent over 2 WUs). |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
"Old" credits vs BOINC's default new credit system