Oh Yeahh.. Indeed...difficult to know.
Sorry about that.
I have a T9400 (Intel Centrino2)

Looks like you're on the Intel Core architecture. Try the Core 64-bit versions of the Open64 compiled app. It should work. Let us know when you're up and running with it and then we can check your scores....;-)

Mike Doerner

---

are there no new x86 or x64 windows athlon 64 or core2 apps? I'm using the onesfrom the very first post.

Nothing yet, but once the linux apps are done, I think TJM may look at the Windows apps again. You can still use the ones listed at the top of the thread, they still work.

Mike Doerner

---

Okay I tried the Core_64 on my T9400 2.53Ghz (Gentoo 64b)
Without the opti : 6 WUs, mean: 1732.04s
With the opti: 4 WUs, mean: 1208.15s

Difference of : -30.25%

Wow ! Good Job !

Normally your opti Core_64 should be the fastest for my computer right?
I just wonder, in order to make a webpage with all these opti, which one is better for which proc...
Like I've seen here, the PIII opti is quite good as well isn't, may be better than Open64 for 32b nope ?

Glad the optimized app works for you. It's hard to know if the other optimized apps would run faster or not on your processor and/or operating system. For Example, when TJM tried the Athlon64 32-bit optimized app on an actual Athlon64, he got a significant reduction in processing time in a 32-bit environment. When I ran it on my Phenom, it ran faster than the default app, but not faster than TJM's P3 app. So you could try the EM64T, Xeon, and other optimized apps and see if they run faster for you. There's really no way to tell you up front which will be faster for you, since we don't have a copy of your computer for testing purposes.

Prior to the Open64 apps, the 64-bit optimized apps weren't much faster than the 32-bit versions. On my system, the 64-bit apps run significantly faster (finally justifying my switch to 64-bit OS.)

Mike Doerner

---

Well...difficult to choose which one is the best then....
I'm gonna try all your app for 64b like Grubix did !

Edit : I got as well a Centrino monocore 1.7Ghz with Ubuntu 32b. I can try on that too.

There are a lot to do I guess....
And if I find the best opti for my proc...does it mean that it will also be the best opti for every similar processor with Linux 64b ?

hmm...small prob for editing... I don't have the botton.
Anyway, I have an other question.
Is it better to compile ourself the opti ? (I mean, will it be faster ?)

hmm...small prob for editing... I don't have the botton.
Anyway, I have an other question.
Is it better to compile ourself the opti ? (I mean, will it be faster ?)

The edit button goes away after 15 minutes or so.....

You can always compile another app for your processor, the source code is available in this thread. What would you compile it with? If you're planning on compiling with gcc or Open64, it's been done, for the most part. If you want to use Intel's compiler, go ahead (the reason those executables have not been included is because of licensing issues), as you can use the Intel compiler for your personal use. There's other commercial compilers available that may be able to compile faster code. The reason gcc and Open64 have been included is because we can freely distribute the compiled executables w/o infringing on any licensing agreements (or pay $$$ for a compiler ;-) ).

Go, go gadget compiler.....:-)

Mike D

---

Okay I see.
I will continue with your archive then. Thanks.

Fiouu.
Finally, I have finished to test every opti.
4Wu per opti on a Centrino2 T9400, Gentoo 64b
WorkUnits: hceyz72_0_xxxxxxx_r0_0

Results:
enigma_0.76_i686-pc-linux-gnu_amdfam10_64_gcc44 1300.91
enigma_0.76_i686-pc-linux-gnu_Athlon64_64 1195.40
enigma_0.76_i686-pc-linux-gnu_Athlon64fx64 1196.91
enigma_0.76_i686-pc-linux-gnu_Barcelona64 1222.80
enigma_0.76_i686-pc-linux-gnu_Intel-Core_64 1207.25
enigma_0.76_i686-pc-linux-gnu_Intel-EM64T_64 1211.735
enigma_0.76_i686-pc-linux-gnu_Intel-Pentium4_64 1213.20
enigma_0.76_i686-pc-linux-gnu_Intel-Xeon_64 1206.26
enigma_0.76_i686-pc-linux-gnu_Opteron64 1203.78
athlon_tb 1412.19
athlon_xp 1404.62
default 1480.06
k6 1393.19
pentium3 1391.32
pentium3_sse2 1393.19
pentium4 1407.62
pentiumpro 1402.01

Winner, definitly Open64 for 64b. And on my computer, surprisingly, the Athlon64_64 is the fastest... Not the Intel-Core. (I've checked twice...)
May be I will do some test on a centrino M, Ubuntu 32b with with liveUSB.

links in OP are bad...

ERROR 403 / BŁĄD 403

You don't have permission to access the requested object.
It is either read-protected or not readable by the server.

What's an OP?

---

sorry...

OP = original post,

ie first post with the links to the optimised client...

DOH! Looks like you're right. TJM will have to fix those so people can grab the optimized code.....

Mike D

---

Can we have the opti of Buninek ?
It would be nice to have it.
Thanks !

DOH! Looks like you're right. TJM will have to fix those so people can grab the optimized code.....

Mike D

I emailed the server admin (the files are on a shared hosting server), waiting for his reply.

---

M4 Project homepage
M4 Project wiki

D'oh! Just when i wanted to start doing Enigma again :(

If you want the opti :
http://www.dudumomo.fr/Boinc/app_test_522.tgz
and
http://www.dudumomo.fr/Boinc/test.tgz

With the Open64 Intel CORE, a gain of 40.30% on a E5200 !Very nice !
on Gentoo64b

By the way, is the Buninek for 64b faster on AMD X2 than your opti mdoerner ?
Definitly on 32b but what about 64b ?
Thanks !