v5.22 Experimental optimized app |
Message boards : Number crunching : v5.22 Experimental optimized app
Previous · 1 . . . 10 · 11 · 12 · 13
Author | Message |
---|---|
Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~GP500 Send message Joined: 9 Jul 13 Posts: 8 Credit: 1,395,819 RAC: 0 |
can you build some for k10 series and the i5 and i7 |
Dingo Send message Joined: 15 Sep 07 Posts: 8 Credit: 11,080,569 RAC: 0 |
Where are the athlon 64 linux files? I have all 64 bit machines so I am unable to get the executable file from Enigma for the 32 bit version. I have made a file from the above instructions, not changing any flags, but I do not know the name of the enigma executable file?? I need to rename the enigma file, I created with the make process above, to this file name. Proud Founder and member of Have a look at my WebCam |
Dingo Send message Joined: 15 Sep 07 Posts: 8 Credit: 11,080,569 RAC: 0 |
OK I shutdown BOINC and I renamed the file /enigma-suite-0.76/enigma, that I created using the instructions in the previous post, to enigma2_0.76_i686-pc-linux-gnu. I put enigma2_0.76_i686-pc-linux-gnu into the /opt/boinc/projects/www.enigmaathome.net folder and also added the app_info.xml from here. When I started BOINC back up it said that wrapper_5.22_i686-pc-linux-gnu and job_1.27.xml were missing and deleted the file enigma2_0.76_i686-pc-linux-gnu. I tried to find somewhere to download the wrapper but could not find one. Where do I go from here, or should I just not worry about it and crunch something else on linux 64 bit. Proud Founder and member of Have a look at my WebCam |
Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~GP500 Send message Joined: 9 Jul 13 Posts: 8 Credit: 1,395,819 RAC: 0 |
it's very slow here and i don't know anything about linux. Sry can't help you. Start from the top again, maybe you'll find your error. |
blub Send message Joined: 17 May 14 Posts: 7 Credit: 1,148,207 RAC: 0 |
I'd like to compile an app for Haswell, but the link with the source code seems dead? |
Dr. Merkwuerdigliebe Send message Joined: 19 Jul 13 Posts: 1 Credit: 103,926 RAC: 0 |
I'd like to compile an app for Haswell, but the link with the source code seems dead? Hi, I would like to compile an optimized version of the app using Linux and gcc. Does anyone have an idea how to do it? Location of the source code and maybe the appropriate compiler flags for a Haswell cpu? |
jbo_85 Send message Joined: 4 Jun 10 Posts: 3 Credit: 22,678,317 RAC: 0 |
I added the source code for the Enigma suite to github. I fixed the Windows build , added some small optimizations by rearranging some code and added support for building with the Intel compiler. I still need to check the compile on Linux. https://github.com/jbo-85/enigma-suite |
Agbar Send message Joined: 10 Sep 09 Posts: 28 Credit: 690,568 RAC: 0 |
How does it compare to https://github.com/Agbar/enigma-optima? |
jbo_85 Send message Joined: 4 Jun 10 Posts: 3 Credit: 22,678,317 RAC: 0 |
That is way faster, 10s --> 7.3s on my machine. Nice job. My repository was mainly meant to document some changes, as the original code just didn't compile anymore. For some reason the precompiled exe of enigma-optima crashed for me. I got a crash even after a recompile with GCC 6.3, that seemed to be fixed with -march=corei7-avx. Is the Intel Compiler faster for it? |
Agbar Send message Joined: 10 Sep 09 Posts: 28 Credit: 690,568 RAC: 0 |
Could you please PM me details of the crash (Or file a bug on github.) IMO Intel Compiler wouldn't be faster, but who knows? Effort may be to big to test IC for 1% speedup. ----- EDIT. There is a bug in AVX2 code in release version. Use beta3 instead on Haswell+ until I will release a bugfix. |
Agbar Send message Joined: 10 Sep 09 Posts: 28 Credit: 690,568 RAC: 0 |
|
NxtGenCowboy Send message Joined: 21 Jan 17 Posts: 2 Credit: 350,350 RAC: 0 |
So I loaded that 1.0.1 version in the post above and my task times doubled :\ core i7 3770k -- About 20-23 minutes went to 40-44minutes |
oh2hyt Send message Joined: 14 Jul 09 Posts: 53 Credit: 705,427,365 RAC: 0 |
Are you sure workunits are same type? Number after first underscore in workunit name tells workunit type. There is about 4x difference in computation time between fastest and slowest, and middle ones are about 2x of fastest. |
NxtGenCowboy Send message Joined: 21 Jan 17 Posts: 2 Credit: 350,350 RAC: 0 |
Some numbers: Wokrunit 0: 916.42 Workunit 1: Haven't seen yet on my Windows box Workunit 2: 1,803.36 Workunit 3 3,164.86 |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
v5.22 Experimental optimized app